Let the sewing commence!
Jul. 12th, 2011 10:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Costume plans keep changing and changing but I bought fabric today so I'm pretty much locked in now.
I finally gave up on the Gangers outfit, for now, because I couldn't find the orangey-brown vinyl/pleather/what-have-you anywhere. So,
eve11 did some brainstorming and thought about going back to femme Five and femme Turlough.
Now, there were a couple of stopping points for me on this originally. One was a difficulty in conceptualizing how I wanted to feminize the outfit. I kept coming up with little pleated school uniform skirts and skimpy sweaters. Being closer to forty than twenty, that really wouldn't look so good on me. The other problem I'd been having was just trying to find a sweater that gave the feel of Five, without spending hundreds of dollars on a cricket sweater.
But then, last night, I had a brainstorm. I came at it from another direction and POW! there it was. Instead of going with a modern female version, go with something a bit more period. That led me to looking at pretty Victorian dresses and then another POW! right in the face. Steampunk, baby. Oh yeah. I've been wanting to do a steampunk dress for ages and this is the perfect time to do it. I found a pattern that I like, which has most of the elements of Five's costume (in one way or another).
I did a little online research, found a hat and half-moon specs (the specs are on order, and I'm going to put the order in for the hat tomorrow) and a lovely breakdown of Five's costume on
dw_cosplay which had great info on the fabrics and styles of his costume. Most of which I'm now throwing out the window. I was a bit concerned about finding a good pattern for the skirt, to match the strip on his trousers (this was another stopping point in the original idea - it's a hard pattern to match), but I did not despair. Eve and I headed out to Joann's this evening and after some searching I found this:

Compare to the actual fabric of Five's trousers:

It's certainly not exact. Mine is a little darker, the red and green are reversed in the wide stripes, there's a thin line of blue in the skinny stripes, and the texture is different (this is upholstery fabric), but the colors are very close and the pattern is almost exact. If I was actually doing trousers, the fabric would have too much sheen and texture, but I think it will work well for the skirt. Thank goodness it was on sale for 50% off, because that stuff isn't cheap. I also got considerably less of it than the pattern calls for. The one thing I don't love about the pattern is that the dress has a whole band at the bottom, probably about a foot in length, that is completely pleated with maybe one inch pleats all around the bottom of the skirt. So that is going and I'm just going to slightly lengthen the upper part of the skirt panels to compensate. I'm so short to begin with that I probably won't have to lengthen them much, lol.
The Doctor's coat is, I believe, some sort of wool, but aside from the fact that wool wouldn't work well with the dress pattern I have, I'm going to be wearing this thing in a parade in Atlanta in summer weather. Just say no to wool. I picked out a nice linen for the coat. It's slightly too buttery in color, but the more beige/taupe fabrics just looked dirty and dingy next to the skirt material, while the buttery color looks fantastic. Some concession must be made to how it works together. The pattern I'm using - Simplicity 2172 - doesn't have an equivalent piece to the sweater, which I'm totally cool with, because the sweater was killing me anyway. And the bustier will serve for his shirt. I picked out a clean white for that, and I'm going to put some red accents on it to replace the placket and collar linings.
We ran out of time at the store before I was able to pick out lining materials and notions, so I'll have to make another trip fairly soon, but I have enough to get started on the skirt and feel like I'm accomplishing something. DragonCon is fast approaching!
I'm really excited and pleased to have found a way to do the Female Five costume and to be able to combine it with the steampunk look that I've been lusting after for years. I just hope I'm able to make it look in reality at least close to what it already looks like in my head.
I finally gave up on the Gangers outfit, for now, because I couldn't find the orangey-brown vinyl/pleather/what-have-you anywhere. So,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, there were a couple of stopping points for me on this originally. One was a difficulty in conceptualizing how I wanted to feminize the outfit. I kept coming up with little pleated school uniform skirts and skimpy sweaters. Being closer to forty than twenty, that really wouldn't look so good on me. The other problem I'd been having was just trying to find a sweater that gave the feel of Five, without spending hundreds of dollars on a cricket sweater.
But then, last night, I had a brainstorm. I came at it from another direction and POW! there it was. Instead of going with a modern female version, go with something a bit more period. That led me to looking at pretty Victorian dresses and then another POW! right in the face. Steampunk, baby. Oh yeah. I've been wanting to do a steampunk dress for ages and this is the perfect time to do it. I found a pattern that I like, which has most of the elements of Five's costume (in one way or another).
I did a little online research, found a hat and half-moon specs (the specs are on order, and I'm going to put the order in for the hat tomorrow) and a lovely breakdown of Five's costume on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Compare to the actual fabric of Five's trousers:
It's certainly not exact. Mine is a little darker, the red and green are reversed in the wide stripes, there's a thin line of blue in the skinny stripes, and the texture is different (this is upholstery fabric), but the colors are very close and the pattern is almost exact. If I was actually doing trousers, the fabric would have too much sheen and texture, but I think it will work well for the skirt. Thank goodness it was on sale for 50% off, because that stuff isn't cheap. I also got considerably less of it than the pattern calls for. The one thing I don't love about the pattern is that the dress has a whole band at the bottom, probably about a foot in length, that is completely pleated with maybe one inch pleats all around the bottom of the skirt. So that is going and I'm just going to slightly lengthen the upper part of the skirt panels to compensate. I'm so short to begin with that I probably won't have to lengthen them much, lol.
The Doctor's coat is, I believe, some sort of wool, but aside from the fact that wool wouldn't work well with the dress pattern I have, I'm going to be wearing this thing in a parade in Atlanta in summer weather. Just say no to wool. I picked out a nice linen for the coat. It's slightly too buttery in color, but the more beige/taupe fabrics just looked dirty and dingy next to the skirt material, while the buttery color looks fantastic. Some concession must be made to how it works together. The pattern I'm using - Simplicity 2172 - doesn't have an equivalent piece to the sweater, which I'm totally cool with, because the sweater was killing me anyway. And the bustier will serve for his shirt. I picked out a clean white for that, and I'm going to put some red accents on it to replace the placket and collar linings.
We ran out of time at the store before I was able to pick out lining materials and notions, so I'll have to make another trip fairly soon, but I have enough to get started on the skirt and feel like I'm accomplishing something. DragonCon is fast approaching!
I'm really excited and pleased to have found a way to do the Female Five costume and to be able to combine it with the steampunk look that I've been lusting after for years. I just hope I'm able to make it look in reality at least close to what it already looks like in my head.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 11:14 am (UTC)=D
p.s. I have to admit, most of your post made absolutely no sense to me, not being a seamstress or Dr. Who fan--haha!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 12:11 pm (UTC)This bodice which I might just make as a vest and wear with this shirt which I can purchase instead of having to make. Found a paisley ribbon tie at the same site, and of course I'm not going to be able to find zig-zag question mark material wholesale but look what I did find! Thinking I can use it as an accent and embroider some question marks on it. I could either make it into the little vest panel in the bodice or use it as the lapel material. OR I could make the whole bodice/vest out of it, although it is just cotton so it might have to be lined and I'd want something shiny to go with it.
That's all I have so far. I also can't decide if my Doctor should wear a skirt or some kind of "sporty" outfit with high boots and pants like the one on the right here. Then I could wear gaiters and get a version of that saddle-shoe look that he has.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 01:43 pm (UTC)That paisley ribbon tie is great, too. A very nice way to evoke the scarf.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:09 pm (UTC)I do like the cropped pants look though. I think I can modify that bodice pattern so it does not need a corset (just give it more room in the back/side panels) and build it as a vest only. From the look of the outfit on the left, the riding outfit can sustain a big wide collar I think. If I could do the shirtwaist, vest, riding pants and high boots, then find maybe a cream-colored duster and accent with a paisley scarf I think that would work for Victorian. Not sure how steampunky it would be though.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, the bodice as a vest, without those huge sleeves, will look a lot less formal, and you're right about the hunting outfit's top. It doesn't provide for the proper layering.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:25 pm (UTC)For me I think that altering the bodice and just going with the puffy sleeve from the shirtwaist will still make a good line and not clash with the riding boots/split skirt.
Now I just have to see if I can find a good final layer/overcoat that can take being fitted over the puffy sleeve from the shirtwaist, and possibly *under* the big wide lapel from the vest. Maybe a short cape? Gotta think about that.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:39 pm (UTC)As an aside, I can never see puffy sleeves without thinking of Anne of Green Gables. Her deprived, orphaned little pre-adolescent heart yearned for puffy sleeves.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:50 pm (UTC)I wonder if I could do the bodice as a vest in the zig-zag pattern, with a lighter solid pattern for the big lapels, and then do the three button clasp things somehow as red question mark buttons.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 04:49 pm (UTC)I've spent the morning looking at things that are labeled Victorian and Steampunk and I've managed to come up with a slightly better idea of what steampunk is, at least to me. It's a sort of stripped down Victorian for women who want to engage in a man's world and want to look pretty damn good while they do it. They strip out all the frou-frou that would be found in a group of ladies sitting around sipping tea and discussing the latest Parisian trends. They want to look sexy but be able to climb the rope ladder up into the airship when needed. Tops are form-fitting, without extraneous fabric. It's not straight-up Victorian, it's Victorian with modern flair and sensibilities.
Taking the sleeves off the bodice and turning it into a vest is a nice steampunk element. The blouse is nice but very straight up Victorian. If you're looking for a ready-made blouse to cut down on the sewing, have you checked out Steampunk Emporium's Ladies Tops (http://www.steampunkemporium.com/store/steampunk_ladies_tops.php?__utma=1.1686573528.1310433731.1310572179.1310574743.6&__utmb=1.1.10.1310574743&__utmc=1&__utmx=-&__utmz=1.1310572179.5.4.utmcsr%3Dgoogle|utmgclid%3DCID9gIjS-qkCFct95Qod3RPhaQ|utmccn%3D%28not%2520set%29|utmcmd%3D%28not%2520set%29|utmctr%3Dsteampunk%2520hats&__utmv=-&__utmk=91149338)? If you scroll through, there are a few blouses that are more on the Victorian end of the scale, without the huge sleeves.
This, by the way, is not at all me telling you how your costume should look, just my thoughts on the difference between steampunk and victorian, since I'm on vacation and doing nothing with my day but websurfing and thinking about steampunk vs. victorian, lol.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 05:35 pm (UTC)It would be nice to keep something with a high neckline so I could use the paisley tie (there is also a paisley bow tie instead of the ribbon tie). I might have to modify the size of the lapels on the ribbon bodice if I don't have something with really puffy sleeves. I can experiment and see what looks good.
Do you think the cycling outfit (bloomers and leggings like that uk pattern) would still look good with a more steampunky top? (ETA: I could use gaiters with the leggings to give it a more steampunk look)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:38 pm (UTC)Incidentally, I was browsing around, looking for some plaid tweed to see how close I could get to Seven's trousers and found a site with lovely tartans that came pretty darn close -- for $80/yd. Yikes!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-28 08:47 pm (UTC)